<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">1.<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Most regulatory agencies have or should have temporary restrictions on the future activities of their officials with respect to the regulated industries concerned.<div><br></div><div>2.<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Definitely. See my comments from August 2010:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/vi-pdp-initial-report/pdfe3itOHmj9w.pdf">http://forum.icann.org/lists/vi-pdp-initial-report/pdfe3itOHmj9w.pdf</a></div><div><br></div><div>CW</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On 22 Sep 2011, at 14:58, McTim wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, CW Mail <<a href="mailto:mail@christopherwilkinson.eu">mail@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Well, many of us have been subject to "cooling off" periods.<br></blockquote><br>can you be more specific?<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">In this particular case, the issue arises because ICANN has wrongly decided<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">that Registrars may apply to become their own Registries.<br></blockquote><br><br>What is that to do with this case?<br><br><br>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A<br>route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>