[governance] Pornography to be blocked by internet service providers unless users opt in

[Dixie Hawtin]

Apparently the story isn't true - the ISPs had actually just agreed to initiate campaigns to assist parents in installing parental control filters which they provided anyways.

See the Open Rights Group response here: http://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2011/censorware-or-child-protection

Best,
Dixie

From: governance at lists.cpsr.org [mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Riaz K Tayob
Sent: 11 October 2011 10:30
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: [governance] Pornography to be blocked by internet service providers unless users opt in

Pornography to be blocked by internet service providers unless users opt in

David Cameron unveils deal with big four providers based on charity's proposals to protect children from sexual content
*

    *
    *
    *   [cid:image001.gif at 01CC8814.71013610] <http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Fsociety%2F2011%2Foct%2F11%2Fpornography-internet-service-providers&title=> reddit this<http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Fsociety%2F2011%2Foct%2F11%2Fpornography-internet-service-providers&title=>

 *   Ben Quinn<http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/benquinn>
 *   The Guardian<http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian>, Tuesday 11 October 2011
 *   Article history<http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/oct/11/pornography-internet-service-providers#history-link-box>
[cid:image002.jpg at 01CC8814.71013610]
People who want to watch pornography online will have to 'opt in' with their internet service providers under measures to be announced by the PM. Photograph: Dan Chung for the Guardian

Subscribers to four of the UK's biggest internet<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/internet> service providers will have to "opt in" if they want to view sexually explicit websites, as part of government-sponsored curbs on online pornography<http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/pornography>.

The measures will be unveiled on Tuesday as David Cameron<http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/davidcameron> hosts No 10 meeting with the Mothers' Union, which earlier this year produced a raft of proposals to shield children from sexualised imagery.

The prime minister is expected to announce other moves in line with the Christian charity's review, such as restrictions on aggressive advertising campaigns and certain types of images on billboards.

There will also be a website, Parentport, which parents can use to complain about television programmes, advertisements, products or services which they believe are inappropriate for children.

The site, which will direct complaints to the regulator dealing with that specific area of concern, is expected to be run by watchdogs including the Advertising Standards Authority, BBC Trust, British Board of Film Classification, Ofcom, Press Complaints Commission, Video Standards Council and Pan European Game Information.

The service providers involved are BT, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin. Customers who do not opt in to adult content will be unableto access pornographic websites.

Cameron gave strong backing in June to the Mothers' Union proposals after he commissioned a six-month review by the charity's chief executive, Reg Bailey. However, Cameron did not commit to legislation.

Bailey's recommendations included providing parents with one single website to make it easier to complain about any programme, advert, product or service, putting age restrictions on music videos and ensuring retailers offer age-appropriate clothes for children.

Cameron wrote to Bailey in June to thank him for his report. "I very much agree with the central approach you set out," the letter said.

"As you say, we should not try and wrap children up in cotton wool or simply throw our hands up and accept the world as it is. Instead, we should look to put 'the brakes on an unthinking drift towards ever-greater commercialisation and sexualisation'."

Bailey's report asked for government and business to work together on initiatives such as ending the sale of inappropriately "sexy" clothing for young children, for example underwired bras and T-shirts with suggestive slogans.

However, he recommended that if retailers do not make progress on the issue they should be forced to make the changes in 18 months.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20111011/f7f17604/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 600 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20111011/f7f17604/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20885 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20111011/f7f17604/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t