[governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

Adam Peake ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Mon Nov 7 08:42:58 EST 2011


How about we suggest no ascii should be used under an idn ccTLD. If
there's cyrillic at the second, third etc level then no one's going to
confuse that with Brazil.
Still think taking this to the Ombudsman would be worthwhile. He might
not be able to make recommendations to help BG, but could provide
advice for the new gTLD round.
Adam



2011/11/6 Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu>:
> I agree with the direction Avri and Imran have taken the suggested language for the letter.
>
> And disagree with all due respect, with Paul that there is any point at trying to get a he said-she said apology process going.
>
> Let's just encourage ICANN to move on towards an open and transparent process in next phase.
>
> Which coincidentally sets stage for a belated .бг (.bg) remedy; with noone making or asking for apologies.
>
> Lee
> ________________________________________
> From: governance at lists.cpsr.org [governance at lists.cpsr.org] on behalf of Daniel Kalchev [daniel at digsys.bg]
> Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 4:52 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: Re: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?
>
> Paul,
>
> This is indeed an interesting proposition, but until now nether the Bulgarian Government, neither ICANN has accepted the possibility that they may have make a mistake at some point. It would be interesting to observe if such progress is possible.
>
> Daniel
>
> On Nov 5, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Paul Lehto wrote:
>
>>
>> To the extent possible, a statement regarding "mutual mistake of fact" is usually grounds to get out of a contract or deal or understanding, and into a new process or negotiation.   It also allows both parties to save face, in that both have made a mistake.  I am not familiar enough with the details of the communications and its history to know if this would possibly apply or not, but if there is some basis for it, I'd advocate serious consideration of making mutual mistake an element of a letter urging reconsideration of this (non)decision.
>>
>> Paul Lehto, J.D.
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



More information about the Governance mailing list