[governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

[Carlos A. Afonso]

As long as the board does not fall into the case-by-case "method" again
this merits review, I think.

--c.a.

On 11/04/2011 11:58 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Well there is a new Board now, with a new chair. All they need to do
> is recognize the mistake and tell the staff to fix it. Takes a little
> courage, but a lot of people on that Board have courage.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 4 Nov 2011, at 03:16, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 03.11.11 18:31, Paul Lehto wrote:
>>> It would seem that there either is, or should be, a process to
>>> "call the question" as they say in parliamentary procedure.  If
>>> not, a motion can be made for a decision, or a letter sent citing
>>> undue delay and calling for a decision (with or without
>>> additional clarifying expertise appended to it). A person
>>> familiar with whatever exists in terms of procedure can recommend
>>> the best format or vehicle for forcing a decision.
>>> 
>> 
>> There is no formal process to question the outcome of the IDN Fast
>> Track applications. By definition, the only possible communication
>> is between ICANN "staff" (whatever that means) and the original
>> applicant. Ironically, even that country's Government does not have
>> formal way to communicate with ICANN on the matter.
>> 
>> Nevertheless, we are exploring every available possibility for some
>> 18 months now, to understand why this situation continues to
>> persist. ICANN staff are very wary of any such discussions and I
>> perfectly understand their position. More so, that the principal
>> that handled this case, Tina Dam, is no longer with ICANN. My
>> understanding is that ICANN now recognizes they made a mistake. But
>> they not only made the mistake to accept blindli this "expert
>> opinion". They also made the mistake to make several statements
>> already to the effect that "this is it, accept it or go away".
>> Therefore, the problem at the moment is how ICANN admits their
>> mistake and how they go out of the rising political problem. I have
>> made many proposals on how to address this, but this has been slow
>> process.. Nobody has given up anyway and it now seems inevitable
>> things will go on a more global and more politicized forums.
>> 
>> Daniel 
>> ____________________________________________________________ You
>> received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, visit: 
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> 
>> For all other list information and functions, see: 
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance To edit your profile
>> and to find the IGC's charter, see: http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> 
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________ You
> received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
> governance at lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, visit: 
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see: 
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance To edit your profile and
> to find the IGC's charter, see: http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 
> 
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t