[governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?
Imran Ahmed Shah
ias_pk at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 5 03:31:47 EDT 2011
I agree with you Avri.
Thanks
Imran
-----Original Message-----
From: governance at lists.cpsr.org [mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf
Of Avri Doria
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 06:59 AM
To: IGC
Subject: Re: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to
other Latin ccTLDs?
Well there is a new Board now, with a new chair.
All they need to do is recognize the mistake and tell the staff to fix it.
Takes a little courage, but a lot of people on that Board have courage.
avri
On 4 Nov 2011, at 03:16, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 03.11.11 18:31, Paul Lehto wrote:
>> It would seem that there either is, or should be, a process to "call the
question" as they say in parliamentary procedure. If not, a motion can be
made for a decision, or a letter sent citing undue delay and calling for a
decision (with or without additional clarifying expertise appended to it). A
person familiar with whatever exists in terms of procedure can recommend the
best format or vehicle for forcing a decision.
>>
>
> There is no formal process to question the outcome of the IDN Fast Track
applications. By definition, the only possible communication is between
ICANN "staff" (whatever that means) and the original applicant. Ironically,
even that country's Government does not have formal way to communicate with
ICANN on the matter.
>
> Nevertheless, we are exploring every available possibility for some 18
months now, to understand why this situation continues to persist. ICANN
staff are very wary of any such discussions and I perfectly understand their
position. More so, that the principal that handled this case, Tina Dam, is
no longer with ICANN.
> My understanding is that ICANN now recognizes they made a mistake. But
they not only made the mistake to accept blindli this "expert opinion". They
also made the mistake to make several statements already to the effect that
"this is it, accept it or go away". Therefore, the problem at the moment is
how ICANN admits their mistake and how they go out of the rising political
problem.
> I have made many proposals on how to address this, but this has been slow
process.. Nobody has given up anyway and it now seems inevitable things will
go on a more global and more politicized forums.
>
> Daniel
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list