AW: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

["Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"]

I would support such a letter. However it goes beyond the .bg case. My impression is that the existing (and proposed) ICANN mechanisms to deal with "confusingly similar" in TLD strings (in particular in the new gTLD program) are too weak and do probably have not the needed expertise. With other words, the IGC letter should include also the proposal to enhance the mechanisms to deal with such potential conflicts. 
 
Here is a another example how confusion can grow: A consotrium of people for Russia and Ukraine want to go under the new gTLD porgramm for .pyc on cyrillic. All three characters are similar the ASCII characters. What to do with a .pyc in Latin?
 
Wolfgang 

________________________________

Von: governance at lists.cpsr.org im Auftrag von Ian Peter
Gesendet: Sa 05.11.2011 05:07
An: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Avri Doria
Betreff: Re: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?



Avri wrote:

> Well there is a new Board now, with a new chair.
> All they need to do is recognize the mistake and tell the staff to fix it.
> Takes a little courage, but a lot of people on that Board have courage.

Perhaps a carefully drafted letter from this Caucus would be useful in this
regard?




> From: Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
> Reply-To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 21:58:57 -0400
> To: IGC <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
> Subject: Re: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to
> other Latin ccTLDs?
>
> Well there is a new Board now, with a new chair.
> All they need to do is recognize the mistake and tell the staff to fix it.
> Takes a little courage, but a lot of people on that Board have courage.
>
> avri
>
> On 4 Nov 2011, at 03:16, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 03.11.11 18:31, Paul Lehto wrote:
>>> It would seem that there either is, or should be, a process to "call the
>>> question" as they say in parliamentary procedure.  If not, a motion can be
>>> made for a decision, or a letter sent citing undue delay and calling for a
>>> decision (with or without additional clarifying expertise appended to it). A
>>> person familiar with whatever exists in terms of procedure can recommend the
>>> best format or vehicle for forcing a decision.
>>>
>>
>> There is no formal process to question the outcome of the IDN Fast Track
>> applications. By definition, the only possible communication is between ICANN
>> "staff" (whatever that means) and the original applicant. Ironically, even
>> that country's Government does not have formal way to communicate with ICANN
>> on the matter.
>>
>> Nevertheless, we are exploring every available possibility for some 18 months
>> now, to understand why this situation continues to persist. ICANN staff are
>> very wary of any such discussions and I perfectly understand their position.
>> More so, that the principal that handled this case, Tina Dam, is no longer
>> with ICANN.
>> My understanding is that ICANN now recognizes they made a mistake. But they
>> not only made the mistake to accept blindli this "expert opinion". They also
>> made the mistake to make several statements already to the effect that "this
>> is it, accept it or go away". Therefore, the problem at the moment is how
>> ICANN admits their mistake and how they go out of the rising political
>> problem.
>> I have made many proposals on how to address this, but this has been slow
>> process.. Nobody has given up anyway and it now seems inevitable things will
>> go on a more global and more politicized forums.
>>
>> Daniel
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t