[governance] IGF plus IGC + only members list.

[Katitza Rodriguez]

It is not *your* message. It is *our* message as civil society members 
of IGC sharing *our* thoughts in advance of a meeting. Comments that can 
be read by *other* stakeholders groups, who does not necessarily share 
*their* views with us in advance of a meeting. People can prepare their 
argument in order to dismiss our work. I do not have anything else to 
add. If  members do not believe this is a problem/and issue/something to 
think about, it is up to them to decide. -- >

I have a major concern: If we do not demonstrated that we are capable to 
organize our self, then we might have problems in the future -- may be 
with the UN trying to decide how civil society should organize itself. 
-- The latest, it is not something I would like to see discussed at a 
gov. level.

Katitza
On 5/22/11 6:25 PM, McTim wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Katitza Rodriguez<katitza at eff.org>  wrote:
>> It would be ok if I also here their opinion  in this list. Many of your
>> opinion harm us while we are there.
> Which opinions of mine harm "us"?  While we are where?
>
>


-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
katitza at eff.org
katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t