[governance] IGF plus IGC + only members list.

[Katitza Rodriguez]

It would be ok if I also here their opinion  in this list. Many of your 
opinion harm us while we are there.
But if this is your opinion, I do not have time to fight against it.

All the best, Katitza

On 5/22/11 7:13 AM, McTim wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Katitza Rodriguez<katitza at eff.org>  wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> need to understand that MAG members have a very difficult task to share
>> strategies in a public list. Any public strategy that we can share here, can
>> always harm our collective efforts in spaces where disclosing your strategy
>> in advance is a big problem and can harm our work.
> It's not "us vs. them", rather in the collaborative Internet Model,
> it's "us + them".
>
> I would not be in favor of removal of transparency by creating a
> separate list.  This is not a war, where intelligence is crucial.  The
> other stakeholders know our perspective and what we want to achieve.
> In other words, I don't think we have any secrets we need to hide, do
> we?
>
>


-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
katitza at eff.org
katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t