[governance] remote paticipation via standardized protocols (was Re: Open consultations)

[Avri Doria]

On 19 May 2011, at 09:07, Roland Perry wrote:

>> of course even the way it was set up at the ITU, while for the most part one could listen - until the broke up in groups that is
> 
> That'll always happen when you get ad-hoc breakout groups and the organisers don't have every possible meeting room/location wired up.


in a well formed plan from remote participation, everyone's laptop etc.  could have to capability to feed into  the remote particpation matrix.

or something like that.  and getting something that  allows for an ad-hoc setup of server would be easier in the FOSS world.  anything that requires a license to be a server limits the spread of the remote participation capability.

and, since CS rarely has the ability to pay the fees for the good private stuff, if we want to carry around the ability to establish remote participation for any meeting anywhere anytime, we need something other than Adobe etc...

no put down on Adobe, just the way of the world.

a.



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t