AW: [governance] Internet G8 meeting

Tue May 10 07:48:40 EDT 2011

Hi,

Two issues with the change

-  the us of 'us'.  I think we should say who we are and what interests we are representing.    Perhaps something like .... unacceptable to the IGC, which advocates for cvil society's Internet governance interests.

- does changing from 'unacceptable' to 'completely unacceptable' add anything?  seems to make it somewhat more informal.

a.


On 10 May 2011, at 05:07, parminder wrote:

> Jeremy
> 
> Can you put civil society before businesses in the phrase ' wide range of business, civil society and technical interests'. That is how UN documents write it. 
> 
> Also in the very last sentence I would like the reference to 'internet users' to be removed. This policy model is also acceptable to the present non-users. 
> 
> I would prefer that we change the following sentence
> 
> "The strong support that many G8 countries, including your own, have shown for full multistakeholder participation makes this current decision to limit discussion to vested interests of governments' industry partners is baffling and is unacceptable to many of the users of the Internet."
> 
> to
> 
> "The strong support that many G8 countries, including your own, have shown for full multistakeholder participation in relation to the UN's Internet Governance Forum makes this current decision to limit discussion to vested interests of governments' industry partners  baffling, and in any case completely unacceptable to us."
> 
> parminder 
> 
> On Tuesday 10 May 2011 12:57 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>> Here's another consolidated draft, with all the generally-agreed changes suggested so far.  As suggested, we'll also have a tweaked version of this with a catchy headline as a press release, and for translating into French.
>> 
>> --- begins ---
>> 
>> Basic courtesy stuff.....
>> 
>> We understand that the French Presidency of the G8 proposes to hold a G8 Internet meeting, immediately prior to the G8 Summit in ........, with a view to prepare or influence the agenda for the G8 Summit regarding key global Internet issues. We also understand that many heads of states of G 8 countries are expected to attend this meeting. The meeting is especially important since in the past G 8 has set up the global agenda on many key issues, especially in the information society arena.
>> 
>> We are very concerned about the manner in which the G 8 Internet meeting is being organised which is ignoring current best practice in public policy making. It also jettisons the principle of multistakeholder participation that has evolved globally, especially in the area of Internet governance. It appears that the G8 meeting is organized by large Industry with access given only to industry and government actors.  We have also understood that there is a linkage between donations and invitations.
>> 
>> Big businesses already have a disproportionately large influence on public policy processes. For governments to sanction a dedicated meeting with top G8 leaders and officials to plan the global agenda for Internet related policies is inappropriate. What is required is a discussion that includes civil society actors, who will bring to the table the concerns of global public interest derived from a diversity of people's, of many sections of society, interests and
>> concerns.
>> 
>> It is also pertinent to state here that since the Internet is essentially a global phenomenon, policies framed together by the most powerful nations, quite likely, will become the default global norm. This is most true for architectural and economic issues, while the global impact on other areas will also be substantial. It is therefore appropriate that G 8 countries engage with the same, and other issues, of Internet policies at the more democratic global forums where all countries are present at an equal footing. In this connection, there is the World Summit on the Information Society mandated set of processes for dealing with pressing global Internet related issues. Multistakeholder participation is an important part of these global IG related processes. We see the proposed G 8 Interent meeting a significant step backwards both for global democracy and for multistakeholder participation.
>> 
>> The issues we face with internet governance and internet developments are global in nature, and adequate solutions to the problems we face will need to involve all countries, as well as a wide range of business, civil society and technical interests.
>> 
>> We therefore request you, and other G 8 leaders, to make the proposed G 8 Internet meeting genuinely multistakeholder, following the model of the UN IGF. We are impressed with the solid support provided by the G 8 countries for upholding a multistakeholder model for the IGF. The strong support that many G8 countries, including your own, have shown for full multistakeholder participation makes this current decision to limit discussion to vested interests of governments' industry partners is baffling and is unacceptable to many of the users of the Internet.
>> 
>> closing and salutations..... 
>> 
>> --- ends ---
>> 
>> I'd like to go to a consensus call on this 48 hours from now if possible.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dr Jeremy Malcolm
>> Project Coordinator 
>> Consumers International
>> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>> 
>> Empowering Tomorrow’s Consumers
>> CI World Congress, 3-6 May 2011, Hong Kong
>> 
>> Businesses, governments and civil society are invited to join consumer groups from around the world for four days of debate and discussion on the issues that matter most to consumers. Register now!
>> http://www.consumersinternational.org/congress
>> 
>> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Parminder Jeet Singh
> Executive Director
> IT for Change 
> NGO in Special Consultative Status with the United Nations ECOSOC
> www.ITforChange.net
> Tel:+91-80-2665 4134, 2653 6890. Fax:+91-80-4146 1055
> <itfc_logo.png>
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t