AW: [governance] Internet G8 meeting

[Jean-Louis FULLSACK]

Thanks to Wolfgang and Parminder 

for providing relevant information and relate it with the actual/current debate inside of the CS accredited in the WSIS process. I fully agree Parminder's proposal for CS -in this case specially its IGC- to react accordingly to the future G8 meeting and to the statement of our narrow-minded and self-profiling president (I mean the French one ...):



Sure, IGC should ! And as quickly as possible !

Best greetings
Jean-Louis Fullsack
CSDPTT-France  




> Message du 05/05/11 08:14
> De : "parminder" 
> A : governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Copie à : 
> Objet : Re: AW: [governance] Internet G8 meeting
> 
> Wolfgang,
> 
> Thanks for this very informative historical brief. There are many points here that I will like to engage with, but let me just respond to two connected ones.
> 
> On Wednesday 04 May 2011 08:16 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote: Hi everybody SNIP Later Al Gore presented this to a G 7 summit in Brussels in 1995, where also a so-called "Global Business Round Table" took place in parallel (which led later to the establishmend of the Global Business Dialogue on eCommerce/GBDe). After the Brussels meeting the G 7 (later the G 8) continued to work on this issue which finally produced the G 8 Okinawa Declaration from 2000 when the G 8 established to Digital Opportunity Task Froce (DotForce). http://www.undp.sk/uploads/Okinawa%20charter.pdf The G 8 DotForce Initiative was countered by an ECOSOC ministerial meeting in 2001 (a lot of UN member states felt excluded from the G7/8 process in Okinawa) and the UN established the UN ICT Task Force (UNICTTF). 
> That is an interesting parallel. Now that G 8 seems to be in a 'global agreement (read, among powerful countries, who are the self appointed trustees for the whole world) on key Internet issues'  sorts of mood, what next. Internet governance is even more political, globally, than was ICTD (the latter being more national kind of thing). So do we expect a UN backlash. It is already on through the politics around the 'enhanced cooperation' process. What is our, global civil society's, specifically, IGC's, position on this?
> 
> Between a G8 led process of the kind underway, and a WSIS mandated 'enhanced cooperation' process, where do we put our weight? (enough burying our collective heads in the sand on the global IG policy issue. That will only bring further harm to our cause. At least now we must learn our lessons that abdication would do on this issue.)
> 
> (SNIP)
> We should not forget that the WSIS/WGIG Internet Governance definition, which gives all stakeholder a role and calls for shared policy and rules development and decision making, was adopted by the heads of states of 190+ UN member states in Tunis in November 2005. Governments of the world commited themselves to the multistakeholder approach in Internet Governance. The French government, host of the G 8, obviously ignores this. Somebody should tell this to the president of this republic. Why not us, the IGC. Who else will? But can we just write to them to make the process more multistakeholder, and not write that a closed process among the most powerful countries is not acceptable to the global civil society, representing marginalised interests, and all countires should be brought to the table to discus the issues that the G8 Internet meeting is proposing to do, and in this regard using the WSIS mandated 'enhanced cooperation' track is the right way to go.
> 
> Should IGC make such statement to the G8 meeting organisers?
> 
> Parminder 
> 
> Wolfgang ____________________________________________________________ You received this message as a subscriber on the list: governance at lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, visit: http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing For all other list information and functions, see: http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see: http://www.igcaucus.org/ Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110505/1b47b8b2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t