[governance] No concluding ending for CSTD WG to IGF improvement

[Jeanette Hofmann]

I think the only powerful means we have is campaigning, campaigning in a 
big way. The way we did in the early stages of WSIS.


jeanette

Am 28.03.2011 14:14, schrieb William Drake:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the assessment Anriette.
>
> On Mar 27, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
>
>> In other words, other than for the non-governmental stakeholders
>> this process was not really about IGF improvements, but about the
>> IGF being a stage for other plays.
>
> Alas, this seems to say it all.  Is there any reason to think this
> will change?  If not, what alternatives should we begin to think
> about?
>
> Best
>
> Bill____________________________________________________________ You
> received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance To edit your profile and
> to find the IGC's charter, see: http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t