[governance] Fwd: The ‘Viral’ Revolutions Spread Across Europe
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Thu Jun 2 08:43:22 EDT 2011
Hi All
The article below from India gives a southern view of the current
political impacts of the internet and the deeper politics behind it.
Important to notice how the key issue here was economic but it turned
into a demand for political change and new practices of 'real
democracy'. We dont necessarily have an alternative model here, but it
is such new institutional possibilities of participatory democracy that
may have become available today that are exciting and must be explored.
Regret to say, the simplistic notions (involving co-option) of
multistakeholderism that we hear so much about as the next political
system is not at all the right direction. In fact, in the form it mostly
gets spoken of and practised in IG arena, it is very much the wrong
direction. Parminder
http://kafila.org/2011/05/30/the-viral-revolutions-spread-across-europe/
The ‘Viral’ Revolutions Spread Across Europe
May 30, 2011
tags: austerity measures
<http://en.wordpress.com/tag/austerity-measures/>, democracy
<http://en.wordpress.com/tag/democracy/>, Greece protests
<http://en.wordpress.com/tag/greece-protests/>, Indignants
<http://en.wordpress.com/tag/indignants/>, Spain
<http://en.wordpress.com/tag/spain/>
by Aditya Nigam
*The New Democratic Upsurges*
The mainstream Western media that celebrated the democracy movements in
the Arab world not very long back, is relatively silent now. For, then
it was the Arab youth’s striving for the ‘western values’ of democracy
that it was celebrating. Now that the cry of ‘democracy’ is arising from
its very midst, it does not seem to quite know what to do. From May 15
on, for almost two weeks Madrid and other Spanish cities have been
witnessing some of the largest demonstrations in recent memory.
Protesters have thronged the Puerta del Sol, virtually camping there. As
government forces started cracking down, demonstrations began to grow in
an ever expanding scale spreading to many other Spanish cities. When the
government moved to ban demonstrations on May 20, in the run up to the
regional and municipal elections, the protests acquired an even more
militant form. A ‘snapshot’ of the rallies in defiance of the ban:
The initial protests against the planned multibillion euro bailout plan
for banks, austerity measures and against high unemployment almost 45
percent among the youth), according to reports, were not very large but
when the government responded by arresting several activists and
demonstrators, things started going out of hand. That was the ‘spark
that lit the prairie fire’. As Ryan Gallagher’s report
<http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/05/puerto-square-spanish-work> in
the /New Statesman/put it:
A demonstration against the arrests was organised in the city’s main
square, Puerta del Sol, and numbers soon snowballed when word got
out over the internet. What began as a group of fewer than a hundred
activists reached an estimated 50,000 within less than six days.
The protesters whose arrests had sparked the initial demonstration
were released and immediately returned to the square. By the time
they arrived, the demonstration was no longer just about their
treatment at the hands of the police. It was about government
corruption, lack of media freedom, bank bailouts, unemployment,
austerity measures and privatisation.
Here is another video of a fierce battle being fought on the streets of
Madrid:
According to a report in Der Speigel
<http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,763836,00.html>,
The protesters have occupied the square for days now, with some
comparing the gatherings to those that took place on Cairo’s Tahrir
Square earlier this year, and demonstrations also continued for the
fifth day in a row on Thursday in Barcelona, Valencia, Bilbao and
Santiago de Compostela. Spaniards living abroad have also set up
protest camps outside the country’s embassies in Berlin, Paris,
London and Amsterdam. Most of the events have been organized online.
After organizing demonstrations in around 50 cities last Sunday, the
Real Democracy Now (the name of the movement that coordinates the
Spanish struggle – AN) movement became a household name virtually
overnight.
By the end of May, the movement had now spread to Greece where, for the
fifth consecutive day yesterday, an estimated 100, 000 people were
demonstrating at the Syntagma square in Athens. Below the parliament
building they stood, chanting ‘thieves’, ‘thieves’ and carrying placards
that said ‘Poverty is the greatest abuse’. Initially calling themselves
the ‘indignants’, the protesters in both Spain and Greece gradually
coalesced into this loose federation with a website and a Facebook page
by the name of Real Democracy Now (see their Manifesto in English
translation here <http://www.democraciarealya.es/?page_id=814>) that
rapidly had over three and a half lakh members signing up. And virtually
in tandem with the Spanish movement’s call for ‘real democracy’, the
Greek movement too has transformed the struggle against austerity and
bailout measures into /a struggle for a changing the political system
itself, into a struggle for radicalizing democracy/.
Athens demonstrations
Athens Syntagma square, image courtesy Greek Reporter
*The Question of ‘Politics’*
This mutation of the essentially ‘economic’ struggle against the bailout
plans and austerity measures into a political struggle for the
transformation of the very terrain of democracy tells us something
serious about the relationship of traditional forms and institutions of
politics and their growing conflict with popular aspirations. The call
for ‘real democracy’ comes in a context where the political parties and
the formal political domain is being seen as highly corrupt and deeply
implicated in the politics of predatory corporations and banks. By and
large, not only political parties but often, even the unions have been
bypassed by the mass mobilizations – an index of the relative redundancy
of these structures of formal democratic politics. A report in the
l’Humanité <http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article1782> put it:
/No trade union, let alone a political party. The workings of
traditional dispute are outmoded, and even deliberately excluded./
Internet, through the exchange in real time via social networks and
chats, has allowed the emergence of a spontaneous free and radical
protest movement by a generation that’s had enough…
The Internet has become a structural element of the movement. /What
is expressed is anger, a desire for radical change and a rejection
of all traditional forms of politics. Which explains the refusal to
be co-opted by any political party or trade union and calls to spoil
ballot cards or vote blank./ Confidence in the Spanish democratic
system is broken; the indignants have the impression that their
voices are never heard. The descent into the street came naturally,
as an extension. The street is also where they want to be heard.
Many observers see the protests in Spain as a continuation of the May
Day demonstration earlier this year. Interestingly, the May Day
demonstration itself, according to Gemma Galdon Clavell
<http://browsertunnel.info/page/000000A/687474703a2f2f626c6f67732e65756f627365727665722e636f6d2f67616c646f6e2f> of
the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, was organized independently of
the mainstream political parties and trade unions and was ignored by the
media. The point is itself worth some serious thought for it clearly
indicates that even those formally bearing the legacy of the Left and
the workers’ movement, were clearly quite out of sync with large
sections of the youth who also aligned themselves to the legacy of the
Left through the May Day demonstration. That is why the entire
atmosphere in these protests was said to be permeated by an
anti-politics sentiment and with a contempt for all political parties.
Once the movement acquired the form of a huge mass movement, obviously
things must have changed further. No longer would the movement have
consisted only of left-wing supporters of the workers’ struggles. People
with different political/ ideological inclinations, people with no
particular political preferences, all started joining into this mass of
‘the indignant’. The manifesto of Real Democracy Now emphasized this
apparently nonpolitical character of the movement when it underlined
something to the effect that ‘we are believers and nonbelievers, we have
different political convictions but the thing that unites us is that we
are angry at economic the state of affairs’.
*The Arab Virus*
What we see playing out here in Spain and Greece is not simply an
aberration. The resonances of the struggles in the Arab world are very
obvious and widely acknowledged. Activist-organizer Beatriz Pérez, 29,
underlines: ‘Egypt and Tunisia was a very important catalyst for the
movement in Spain’, which constituted an inspiration and a trigger,
apart from inspiration of the recent student demonstrations in the UK. A
report in Hurriyat Daily News
<http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=a-bird8217s-eye-view---the-revolution-spreads-north-2011-05-27>,
recently recalled its own speculations sometime ago, about the
possibility of the North African and Middle Eastern revolution engulfing
Europe – a possibility that it now saw becoming a reality. The
resonances however, are not simply limited to the fact that the Internet
and Facebook etc became the major vehicles of organizing the protests.
These similarities are in fact linked to some other quite significant
issues – those that pertain to the ‘implosion of the political’.
Throughout the Arab world, this was in a very different context,
precisely the situation of the formal domain of politics. Political
parties lay at the feet of the establishment or had reduced themselves
to complete inefficacy. In country after country across North Africa and
West Asia, we have seen people in their hundreds of thousands march at
the head and parties follow. The vanguards – Leninist and non-Leninist –
all reduced to the ultimate pathos of ineffective, closed sects in some
cases; or to political instruments in service of bankers and
corporations. In earlier times, there was no way of communicating
without the mediation of these organizations and their leaders. Things
have changed now and direct communication and discussion has become
possible through the Internet. A lot of discussion now happens there.
But the Arab revolutions also have a ‘spiritual’ effect over these
movements insofar as they are equally invested in the values of democracy.
Thus Dick Nichols of the Green Left Weekly
<http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/47731>, reports from Barcelona:
The central plazas of dozens of cities and towns across Spain bear
an uncanny resemblance to Tahrir Square in Cairo. They have been
taken over by thousands of demonstrators demanding a “new system”.
As of May 29, dozens of other central plazas in Spanish cities and
towns look the same — taken over by thousands of ordinary people
demanding “a new system.
As speculations mount about Greece defaulting on its loan repayment from
the IMF, the pressure has been building up on the government from
international financial and corporate circles. In earlier times, such
pressure would have worked and all political parties, seduced by the
logic of neo-liberalism would have fallen in line. Not any more. It is
clear here, to ordinary people as well, that if austerity measures a put
in place after the debt is repaid, that will lead to further cuts in
salaries and pension and result in further increase in unemployment and
homelessness. That is no longer acceptable. And as the Hurriyat report
underlines, if Greece defaults, that will not be the end of the story;
it will most certainly be followed by Portugal, Ireland and Spain – with
Italy not very far behind.
Here too, the link with the Arab revolts is quite obvious – though the
issues may not be quite the same. But whatever the differences between
the European and the Arab situation, one thing is quite clear: the
question of livelihoods is central here and the fact that increasingly
decisions about peoples’ lives are being taken away from their hands and
manipulated in the name of some abstract notions of well-being which
ultimately amount to the enrichment of some at the cost of vast
majorities of populations.
*Democracy in Practice*
There is no doubt that none of the great movements sweeping the world in
this part of the twenty-first century has any attachment to or any
fixation with a programme. On the contrary, it cares two hoots about
those who have. For those who have made programmes behind closed doors
and do not want them to be discussed democratically, there is nothing
but contempt in these movements. Yes, they do want to transform things
but the critical question here is, rather than capture power and start
mimicking the erstwhile powerful, one of creating new ground rules. The
critical thing is to enunciate a different political practice so that
whoever comes to power – the bourgeois or his Leninist mimic – will all
have to be governed by those new ground rules. Not revolutionary? So be
it. That is the fantasy of revolutionaries, not of the masses. It never
was. Meanwhile, Puerta del Sol has been converted into a huge popular
assembly where policies are being debated. Different commissions are
drawing out policy proposals that are then discussed in the assembly,
which has itself become a huge training camp, in between fighting street
battles with government forces. Here is a glimpse from the /New
Statesman/ report:
The protesters at Puerta del Sol are interested only in action, not
rhetoric. In the square, they built a makeshift campsite, including
everything from a children’s nursery and a library to a kitchen
offering free food donated by local businesses.
In the space of a few days they had created separate working
commissions to form proposals for change to current government
policy. A social and migration commission would look at immigration
policy, the health commission would focus on how to deprivatise
health-care services. Other commissions were formed to handle
politics, education, the economy and the environment.
Among the camp’s immediate demands were calls for electoral reform,
the dissolution of the Spanish parliament’s second chamber, and an
end to a much-despised policy of “salaries for life” for politicians.
The movement itself has no single leader or figurehead; all
decisions are made by consensus at general assemblies, held twice
daily. Hundreds, sometimes thousands, attend the meetings, and no
decision is taken until every single person is in agreement.
The meetings are long and laborious – occasionally lasting more than
four hours at a time – but seem so far to have been successful.
Do you get a whiff of anti-Leninist, anti-vanguardist, anarchism? How
can the people ever discuss and decide! They can and they do. Maybe that
is where the twenty-first century will reverse the perversions of the
twentieth.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110602/ca7bead6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 26643 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110602/ca7bead6/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list