AW: [governance] CSTD IX. Conclusions and recommendations

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<2DA93620FC07494C926D60C8E3C2F1A8A07741 at server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de>, 
at 12:28:32 on Wed, 26 Jan 2011, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" 
<wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> remarked:
>I am aware that this will trigger a debate about the nomination of chairs or rapporteurs. However the message from a workshop could be "one
>group says so and the other group says so". The message in this case would be: This is an important issue, but there is no agreement. And if
>you have 60 workshops you would have 60 rapporteurs (with about 150 messages) which guarantees to a certain degree diversity and a fair
>reflection of all positions.

The fairly new requirement to file a workshop report (in order to 
qualify as a possible organiser the following year) should mean that 
there are plenty of reports in circulation. But I have to admit I've 
never gone back and read any of the reports (but I did watch the 
Videocast of a couple of workshops that clashed with others in Vilnius).

The outcomes should be accessible, and while the archive of videocasts 
is good, I think there needs to be more work cataloguing and presenting 
these reports.

It's interesting that you've chosen the Workshop part of the IGF as the 
one with possibly the most useful outcomes. Another indication that the 
Main Sessions are beginning to lose their appeal with many (although I 
wouldn't miss them for the world).
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t