AW: [governance] CSTD IX. Conclusions and recommendations

Roland Perry roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Wed Jan 26 09:14:44 EST 2011


In message <4D401113.4050606 at nupef.org.br>, at 10:18:27 on Wed, 26 Jan 
2011, Graciela Selaimen <graciela at nupef.org.br> writes
>This is why I think it would be interesting to have the workshops in 
>the two first days of the meeting. Their messages could be the main 
>input for the plenary sessions; the moderators of the main sessions 
>would have to work together with rapporteurs of the workshops in order 
>to focus the sessions on the presentation and discussion of the 
>messages and this would make these sessions really linked to the 
>workshops - something that we've been highlighting as desirable for years...

I wonder if the moderators think they could work to that timescale? And 
it begs the question of who you have as "panellists" (even if they are 
mainly sat in the audience) if you don't have a good idea what the 
subject matter is going to be until Wednesday.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



More information about the Governance mailing list