AW: [governance] CSTD IX. Conclusions and recommendations

[Graciela Selaimen]

Hi, Wolfganfg and all,

>
> I am aware that this will trigger a debate about the nomination of chairs or rapporteurs. However the message from a workshop could be "one group says so and the other group says so". The message in this case would be: This is an important issue, but there is no agreement. And if you have 60 workshops you would have 60 rapporteurs (with about 150 messages) which guarantees to a certain degree diversity and a fair reflection of all positions.

This is why I think it would be interesting to have the workshops in the 
two first days of the meeting. Their messages could be the main input 
for the plenary sessions; the moderators of the main sessions would have 
to work together with rapporteurs of the workshops in order to focus the 
sessions on the presentation and discussion of the messages and this 
would make these sessions really linked to the workshops - something 
that we've been highlighting as desirable for years...

my 2 cents,

graciela
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t