[governance] MAG meeting
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Fri Feb 25 18:16:41 EST 2011
>In message <CAADCFAC-1DB4-4BE4-83FE-8268C24450E4 at acm.org>, at
>20:59:20 on Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> writes
>>
>>On 25 Feb 2011, at 20:42, Roland Perry wrote:
>>
>>>In message <p0624081fc98d21dbe476@[10.58.179.68]>, at 02:16:55 on
>>>Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> writes
>>>
>>>>And we should ask that the commitment to the rotation of MAG
>>>>members is honored.
>>>
>>>This is one thing that puzzles me. MAG rotation is supposed to be
>>>one of the topics that the MAG recomends[1]. But there have been
>>>several occasions (this week was one) where the topic seemed
>>>taboo. And the final impression was that it was entirely the gift
>>>of the UN.
>>
>>In the past this was up to the MAG. And with the exception of a
>>few people, most chose not to step down voluntarily. There was a
>>discussion of rotation most every year, and some MAG members were
>>replaced every year. I have actually never seen a graph of how
>>many, in total and per group, rotated each year, so I don't know
>>what the facts of rotation are.
>
>It's disappointing that there's apparently no official record of
>this, but I have my own chart - which I referred to a few days ago.
>It reveals almost no rotation in 2008, and a new influx of about 20
>in 2009 who join 16 people appointed in 2006 and 18 from 2007.
I think there was a goal of one third per rotation.
There's probably some record in the MAG list or record of a consultation.
Pretty sure it was about one third each year as that would have meant
by the end of the five year mandate the full MAG would have swapped
out. It's a pretty sustainable refresh rate.
Adam
>>I know the anecdotal impressions, but have no idea of what is the
>>case. Has anyone done the tracking and have informative pictures?
>
>Perhaps I should publish my chart.
>
>>At the point of your puzzlement, at this point all organizational
>>issues that do not relate specifically to IGF 2011 are out of the
>>IGF and MAG's hands. Whatever the prior conditions were, all
>>organizational issues and improvements belong to the blue ribbon
>>panel of the CSTD IGF WG.
>
>If that's the case (and I'm not disputing it) then their outcome
>will most certainly not affect IGF2011 (because it has to be sent
>via CSTD to ECOSOC etc), so we have yet another annual cycle with no
>MAG renewal. Which means that even the newest appointees have had
>three years tenure.
>
>>If they solve this and only this, they will have made great
>>progress. It is really hard to get a group to remove itself from
>>the core. Somehow it seems that many of those who have a special
>>seat will do anything to hold on that seat - though there are some
>>few that do surrender them readily and believe in things like term
>>limits that make it easier to do so.
>
>I had originally understood the MAG rules to say that 1/3 would be
>retired every year, with the assumption that (once there was a
>couple of years to get a pattern started) this would be the
>longest-serving 1/3. But that's clearly not what's happened.
>--
>Roland Perry
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
>For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list