[governance] CSTD WG meeting started

[Izumi AIZU]

There is no mention of Chatham House rules or not. Nobody dared to
ask, including
myself. But I think it's safer to assume so at this point.

We are now moving to discuss how to discuss the substantial discussion,
including how to break into Working Groups, one suggestion is to form
Drafting group, another suggestion is to make several working groups
around the themes/topics of the Report and compile them into Draft report.

"observers" - sitting back of the room have not taken floor. No one asked for.
Us, "Interactive participants" or non-governmental stakeholders are all have
equal speaking opportunities. No one challenged that, and instead several
governments including Iran expressed welcoming all stake holders participation
into this group, very clearly. Good sign.

izumi

2011/2/25 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> hi,
>
> I understand it is a Chatham house rules meeting.  if that is indeed the case you could send concepts and points without identifying who or even what stockholder group uttered them.
>
> Though I believe it is within the rule of Chatham house for anyone to identify what it is they themselves say (as long as they edit out any identifying marks of who they are responding to)
>
> btw the tweet crowd says you are still on procedures.
>
> are the observers being allowed to speak?
>
> were all the IGO observers seated?
>
> a.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t