[governance] Provisional suggestion – on the structure of IGF (meeting)

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<AANLkTikVZdRVZAWBOj=BH-c44an9vMCzRnhTRxcRwy3Z at mail.gmail.com>, at 
19:17:31 on Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> writes
>Some of CS members feel that IGF should not be an annual event ending
>at the last day of its meeting – but rather a continuum process – and
>we like to see some innovation in this regard.

Wasn't that the role of Dynamic Coalitions? Do you think that concept 
failed, and if so why? What would be different, if a new type of ongoing 
process was introduced?
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t