[governance] Proposed workshop text on global net neutrality

[parminder]

On Monday 11 April 2011 11:43 AM, McTim wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM, parminder<parminder at itforchange.net>  wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 11 April 2011 08:43 AM, McTim wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:37 AM, David Allen
>> <David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu>  wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2011, at 5:23 PM, McTim wrote:
>>
>> Provenance is never precise, is it.  But many (quite well) informed folks,
>> wrt the US comms policy process, were satisfied that the private
>> Google-Verizon deal set the terms for what emerged finally at the FCC.
>>
>> It was the previous multilateral negotiations that formed the basis of
>> the FCC proposal.  It also informed the GV agreement.  If you notice,
>> the most objected to bit of the GV (treat wireless differently) isn't
>> in the FCC proposal.
>>
>> It is very much in the FCC proposal, and the most criticized part of it.
> Perhaps you should read it again:
> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.pdf
>
> pages 58-61
>

The current NN guidelines were issued by FCC in Dec 2010, where a 
differentiation between fixed and mobile Internet is made. The document 
you refer to seems to be an old one. parminder


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110411/655de402/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t