[governance] Proposed workshop text on global net neutrality

[McTim]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 April 2011 08:43 AM, McTim wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:37 AM, David Allen
> <David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 5:23 PM, McTim wrote:
>
> Provenance is never precise, is it.  But many (quite well) informed folks,
> wrt the US comms policy process, were satisfied that the private
> Google-Verizon deal set the terms for what emerged finally at the FCC.
>
> It was the previous multilateral negotiations that formed the basis of
> the FCC proposal.  It also informed the GV agreement.  If you notice,
> the most objected to bit of the GV (treat wireless differently) isn't
> in the FCC proposal.
>
> It is very much in the FCC proposal, and the most criticized part of it.

Perhaps you should read it again:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.pdf

pages 58-61


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t