[governance] IGC & IGF

[William Drake]

Hi

On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:

> On 26-Oct-2010, at 6:58 PM, William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
> 
>> IGF will be renewed, the issue is in what format, what "improvements" may be made.  For example, would it be an improvement from a nongovernmental stakeholder standpoint to have the secretariat become a unit of DESA directly under Mr. Sha in NY (which could also entail moving the consultations there), to whom we've just written about the marginalization of nongovernmental stakeholders at DESA's NY consultation on EC?  There are reasons to wonder.  There are also reasons, one would think, to express support for those who've consistently supported us.
> 
> Sure, thanks for raising this. Do you have time to propose some text?

It doesn't appear there's much interest in addressing this, so the ISOC and ICC briefing doc for UN GA reps will have to suffice as the nongovernmental view for now.  Maybe the CSTD group will address it if it's relevant at that point...

Best,

Bill____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t