[governance] IGC Nominations to CSTD
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Mon Oct 25 11:01:38 EDT 2010
>Do you think a MAG member wouldn't be carrying what you mentioned? MAG
>members have also be selected from within IGC? I can't speak for
>others but my involvement within MAG has been to promote and further
>IGC. Why would we want to create such a division?
Because you would be reviewing yourself and your
own future. Doesn't make good sense, or good
process.
I've been a MAG member, so am also speaking from
experience. Also, I think it is time to share
experience around, but that's not the main reason
in this case.
Best,
Adam
>On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>> As the working group's to study the IGF and improvements, suggest it's best
>> not to recommend current MAG members and advisors in our nominations.
>> Hardly impartial. Not sure about past members, also probably not.
>>
>> Would be sensible to recommend people with a solid record of involvement in
>> the IGF (organized/led workshops, main sessions, remote access and
>> particularly national and regional IGFs).
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>>> Fouad, our current timetable is the end of this week to submit names - but
>>> we are currently seeing whether a few days grace is available.
>>>
>>> Then of course CSTD has to choose from our slate - I have no idea what
>>> their
>>> timing might be.
>>>
>>> Clearly our timetable is very tight and not likely to ease up....and yes
>>> it
>>> would appear that those selected by CSTD might get quite short notice.
>>>
>>> Ian Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com>
>>>> Reply-To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, Fouad Bajwa
>>>> <fouadbajwa at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:36:33 +0500
>>>> To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
>>>> Cc: Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [governance] IGC Nominations to CSTD
>>>>
>>>> Hello Ian,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for sharing the attached document. It can be seen from the
>>>> following text from the document that the CSTD WG will meet
>>>> face-2-face back to back with the MAG meeting. This does create the
>>>> need of IGC selected members to be actually present and if this list
>>>> is finalized soon and supposedly any of the MAG members that are also
>>>> IGC members are selected by the nominating committee, they can plan
>>>> and book their stay well in advance so this can be managed
>>>> conveniently within time?
>>>>
>>>> b) Face-to-face consultations and first meeting of the Working Group
>>>> A face-to-face open and inclusive consultation meeting will be
>>>> organized by the Chair of the Working Group on IGF in Geneva on 24
>>>> November 2010, back to-back with the IGF open consultations and MAG
>>>> meeting, scheduled to be organized by the IGF Secretariat from 22 to
>>>> 23 November 2010. The outcome of the open consultations will be used
>>>> as input to the first CSTD Working Group meeting, which will take
>>>> place in conjunction with the CSTD inter-sessional panel meeting in
>>>> December 2010.
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a schedule for the Nominating Committee to conduct the
>>>> process for selection of its members to the CSTD WG yet?
>>>>
>>>> -- Best
>>>> Fouad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Katitza,
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't have a great deal of information and are seeking more, but
>>>>> this
>>>>> attachment might help and gives a basic explanation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org>
>>>>>> Organization: EFF
>>>>>> Reply-To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, Katitza Rodriguez
>>>>>> <katitza at eff.org>
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:21:50 +0200
>>>>>> To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [governance] IGC Nominations to CSTD
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Ian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please let us know when does the CSTD meeting will take place?
>>>>>> If its only a meeting, or many different meetings? How much time the
>>>>>> tasks might include? This would be useful to make sure people will
> >>>>> assume the responsibilities they need to take for that position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you, Katitza
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>>
>>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>>
>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>
>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
>--
>Regards.
>--------------------------
>Fouad Bajwa
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list