[governance] DRAFT IGC Response to Questionnaire on improvements

[McTim]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> I would strike "Yet we still have not seen real tangible outcome
>> directly out of IGF process."
>>
>> As there are not supposed to be real tangible outcomes, are there??
>
> This is completely wrong, imho.
>
> A lack of binding authority does _not_ mean no tangible outcomes

Perhaps my definition of tangible was too restrictive.

 - if it does, then that will be used by those who favor centralized
hierarchical governance to prove that IGF doesn't work.
>
> If we can't show, or don't believe, that IGF has any influence then we are wasting our time there.

capacity building is rarely time wasted.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t