[governance] FOURTH DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation
Avri Doria
avri at psg.com
Tue Nov 9 19:06:12 EST 2010
On 9 Nov 2010, at 18:41, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> Does anyone else prefer me to put back the "do nothing" option (ie. "making no institutional changes but encouraging organisations to enhance their own cooperation with other stakeholders and to report to the CSTD on their progress")?
I think your way of describing might be a bit prejudicial.
I support the 'do no harm while supporting the existing efforts' clause as defined by McTim.
a.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list