[governance] [5 of 6] How best to link with regional meetings?

[Eric Dierker]

Jeremy,
I know you are working on specifics and your diligence and trudging is appreciated. I digress to the larger picture that is almost like the orange* elephant in the corner of the room.Yesterday we got word of some GAC in the ICANN developments. see Miltons: http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/6/23/4560694.html
What
 this discussion must address is not just our or a MAG's desire for inclusion and exclusion but the ratification of governments and/or their antagonism.  The mere words of the
 organization under which we labor in this task is United Nations and this must be kept at the forefront of our process. This is not to say blind abeyance. This is to say - Respectful Interface and the fostering of our Universal Rights in a way that promotes
 accomplishment rather than division. From the inside to the outside we must be aware that attraction is far more useful than mandate or persuasion. 
*a little different than the proverbial pink elephant

--- On Thu, 6/24/10, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:

From: Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>
Subject: [governance] [5 of 6] How best to link with regional meetings?
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 7:37 AM

The penultimate question in the MAG's questionnaire that we have been working through is:
How best to link with regional meetings?


Since the first IGF meeting was held in Athens, a similar concept has been taken up at a regional and national level.  There are currently as many as eight of these at a regional level, and fourteen at a national level.  Often, these meetings also use the name "Internet Governance Forum" or "IGF".  However, they have no formal link with the Internet Governance Forum beyond being listed on the IGF's Web site, and sharing a few of the same participants.
The main issue that this question raises, as I see it, is whether there should be a stronger link between the regional meetings and the central one.  If so, we need to consider and provide feedback on questions such as:
What criteria should the regional/national IGFs satisfy in order to qualify for this stronger linkage?  For
 example, how open and multi-stakeholder must they be, and how transparent and inclusive their organisation?If there should be a set of criteria that regional/national IGFs must meet, how and by whom should it be developed?Should it be permitted to have more than one IGF per region or country, or should the global IGF enforce a rule that only one event per region or country can be officially recognised?Should the programme of the regional/national IGFs be coordinated with that of the global IGF?  If so, how? - perhaps through some sort of global council of IGFs?Should written reports of regional/national IGFs be distributed to the global IGF?Should verbal reports from regional/national IGFs be given at a main session at the global IGF?Should panelists from the other IGFs be given priority in selection for panels at the global IGF?Should each session organiser at the global
 IGF be required to give an opportunity for reports relevant to that session from regional/national IGF organisers?
I'm sure you can think of more ideas, so please let's hear them.  A practical example of how one organisation has addressed a similar issue is found in the guidelines that the TED conference sets for its affiliated events: http://www.ted.com/pages/view/id/351.
-- Jeremy Malcolm
Project Coordinator
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599CI is 50Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in 2010.Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer rights around the world. 
http://www.consumersinternational.org/50

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100625/a99b0e33/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t