[governance] [6 of 6] How best to link with international

[Baudouin SCHOMBE]

 agree, Jeremy, but this requires a good representation of  rapporteurs. But
in what languages the reports should they be made? Apologize for this
question.

It will also consider what institutions must submit these reports as it may
have a positive impact and overall level of different communities.

Furthermore, the Secretary General's report is explicit, of course, but my
question is often on the involvement and participation of agencies of the
United Nations system in the public policy of ICT in some African countries!
I am aware that some countries in Africa, did not include digital technology
in their program. And it has consequence, the absence of reports of ICT
development in these countries. There develops a digital jungle can have
serious consequences in the country and negative impact in other countries.
IGF report  can be used with some advocacy by regional or international
organisations in their policy of supporting the development of countries
that have not or have difficulties in preparing the public plotique of ICT
to ensure the governance Internet from the bottom of the pyramid.

SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC)
COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
GNSO and NCUC MEMBER (ICANN)

Téléphone mobile: +243998983491/+243999334571
                          +243811980914
email:                   b.schombe at gmail.com
blog:                     http://akimambo.unblog.fr
siège temporaire : Boulevard du 30 juin Immeuble   Royal, Entrée A,7e
niveau.


2010/7/2 Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>

> The final question of the MAG questionnaire, which we have been
> progressively working through, is:
>
> *How best to link with international processes and institutions?*
>
> The discussions that take begin at the IGF mostly end there, too.  Although
> we hear much about the effect that the IGF is having in the wider world, the
> Secretary-General's report on the IGF's renewal noted "that the IGF had not
> provided concrete advice to intergovernmental bodies and other entities
> involved in Internet governance" and "that the contribution of the IGF to
> public policy-making is difficult to assess and appears to be weak".  A
> workshop held on this issue by IT for Change in Sharm had reached the same
> conclusion.  So how do we improve this state of affairs?
>
> We might recommend that just as the IGF and its workshop organisers will be
> appointing online rapporteurs to bridge between online and offline
> discussions during meetings, so too there should be rapporteurs whose job it
> would be to summarise relevant discussions at the IGF and to forward them to
> external institutions, and to act as a conduit for feedback from those
> institutions.
>
> Ideally these summaries would include both main sessions and workshops,
> since much of the valuable discussion at the IGF takes place in the latter.
>  Alternatively, they could be limited to the main sessions provided that a
> better mechanism for feeding the output of workshops back into main sessions
> was realised.
>
> In either case, such summaries transmitted from the IGF need not take the
> form of recommendations (though in the rare event that a rough consensus had
> been reached on a particular issue, there is no reason why they couldn't
> take that form).
>
> Do you like these ideas, or do you have others of your own?  Let's hear
> them.
>
> --
>
> *Jeremy Malcolm
> Project Coordinator*
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
> *CI is 50*
> Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in
> 2010.
> Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer
> rights around the world.
> *http://www.consumersinternational.org/50*
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=100521&int1stParentNodeID=89765>.
> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100703/6aebded2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t