[governance] Re: Separate statement on themes for Vilnius

[Fearghas McKay]

On 31 Jan 2010, at 15:17, McTim wrote:

> Here is a suggestion.  Why don't we pitch instead of a "Right to
> Internet Development", which would be the right to develop Internet
> policy and standards in a bottom up, open, documented and transparent
> fashion, independent from commercial and governmental interests.
>
> This combines Rights and a Development Agenda together in once  
> concept.
>
> I would think the technical community would get behind this!

+1 for this suggestion.

The RIR community has long established processes that can be adopted  
for both the IGC & the IGF in the future.

Not sure the ITU community will be quite so keen on it though.

	f
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t