[governance] Re: Separate statement on themes for Vilnius

[McTim]

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
> And yes we should continue to support the human rights and development
> agendas. We need to find a way to overcome the block on rights discussions
> which was evident last year – if anyone has suggestions on how we might
> achieve this I would be interested.

Here is a suggestion.  Why don't we pitch instead of a "Right to
Internet Development", which would be the right to develop Internet
policy and standards in a bottom up, open, documented and transparent
fashion, independent from commercial and governmental interests.

This combines Rights and a Development Agenda together in once concept.

I would think the technical community would get behind this!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t