[governance] < 24 hours remaining to vote YES + thematic working groups, YES or NO

[William Drake]

Hi

On Jan 30, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:

> 
> Here once again is the statement on which we have a consensus call.  Everyone who has voted YES so far has been contacted off-list to clarify their attitude towards thematic working groups - none have yet changed their vote.

And, I presume, to ascertain that they are IGC members in good standing, not just list subscribers, per standard practice?

 On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:

> On 30/01/2010, at 3:27 AM, William Drake wrote:
> 
>> I am at the same time coordinating a drafting team in the GNSO, on the AoC implementation plan.  When corporate lobbyists or others ask that language be included, I don't take it upon myself to decide this gets in, this stays out, this I'll reword to suit my views rather than those of the person who made the suggestion—even if I strongly disagree with it.  If there's no obvious consensus it goes in brackets and then we try to work it out.  We used to do things that way in the IGC, and I don't recall us deciding on a more centralized approach.
> 
> We will welcome your nomination for coordinator next time, Bill.

Thank you for responding to my concerns so seriously, Jeremy.  Really befits the co-coordinator role.

Bill____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t