[governance] IGC statement FINAL VERSION

[Yehuda Katz]

I also echo Sivasubramanian's ITU concerns.

> "...	We do not see any benefit to the IGF in moving underneath a different
UN
> body such as the ITU. ..."

The line is too-weak and apprehensive, They (the Powers to be) will simply 'not
address it' and let it pass over. It must be a more defined Stated-Position.

Per Siva: (I massaged it alittle)
" We are opposed to any 'enhanced role' for the ITU in convening the IGF" 

Also support the Statement for Position, for Oral Argument (Our advocacy) at
the MAG Table.

Now is the TIME , Lets be PREPAREed, In a Post IGF World: The ITU will
assimilate the Advocacy-Space we now enjoy.
Statements already made by the ITU Chair, have positioned themselves for that
assimilation. As a consequence of that ... we must respond and address a
Position.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t