[governance] Censorship

[Eric Dierker]

What up here Ginger? This Parminder directly attacks Roland and specifically calls what he is doing bad, this is Rolands livelyhood so it is definate defamation if not true.  Why when I use the same concept far more abstractly. am I called on the carpet -- but not Parminder???
 
I think you should retract your censorship of me. I think that your attempt to curtail my participation and not Parminder shows just how innappropriate censorship is.

--- On Wed, 1/27/10, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:


From: Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>
Subject: Re: [governance] IGC statement FINAL VERSION
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Roland Perry" <roland at internetpolicyagency.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 6:04 PM




Roland Perry wrote:
> In message <4B602988.8030603 at wzb.eu>, at 11:54:48 on Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu> writes
>> I don't think it is a good idea to renegotiate the agenda two months before an IGF meeting. It is neither possible to invite speakers nor to arrange workshops around main sessions if the last MAG meeting before the IGF may revise the agenda.
> 
> Which is exactly why I have earlier suggested that having a MAG meeting (rather than another September09-ish meeting) in July 2010 is a bad idea.

Let us tie our hands, lest we do something wrong!

This just comes from lack of faith in governance processes. Why would we think that a MAG like group will be so stupid as to go about doing stuff that is not in the best interest of the IGF?

Why then, lets not have any MAG and even any IGF at all, who knows what they may come up with and upset happily settled apple carts.

(No one really spoke about 'renegotiating' agenda at the last moment! Did anyone. So this rhetoric is unnecessary and distracting. Only about fine-tuning language, getting closer to specific topics/ policy questions, deciding things about structural evolutions, detailing agenda for moderators etc, anything that may need a last minute decision - why preempt? And also why such an eagerness to forget that it is not only the third meeting we are speaking about dispensing with here, but also the second!!)

Parminder
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100127/24f39255/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t