[governance] IGC statement Para 2 REVISION 2.x
Ian Peter
ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Sun Jan 17 02:32:20 EST 2010
Mc Tim, you could also do a third sheet and put the various technical folk
into PS, which is definitely where at least some of them belong. That would
give another and different skew.
Also
> NB: Not all CS MAG members may be IGC subscribers, but if I understand
> our charter well, ALL list subscribers who are on the MAG should be
> considered CS members.
NO. Don't know where you got that from. Some are government and some are PS.
This is an open list.
And irreverently
"A SEARCH indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." (Apologies to Jon Postel)
A name is an irrelevance these days.
> From: McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:28:24 +0300
> To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>
> Subject: Re: [governance] IGC statement Para 2 REVISION 2.x
>
> All,
>
> In my initial spreadsheet, I did NOT count the Internet Technical
> community folk as CS, even tho many of them are on the IGC list. When
> I have done these spreadsheets in the past, some have objected to the
> notion of ITC folk counting as CS.
>
> As most of you know, I DO count them as CS, so this second sheet does
> that. By this analysis, CS and govt representation is roughly
> equivalent, and the PS gets the short end of the stick.
>
> I am assuming that many of the folk on the MAG that I have counted as
> ITC are on the IGC list. I leave it as an exercise for the
> coordinators, who have a list of those subscribed, to compare MAG
> members to list subscribers.
>
> NB: Not all CS MAG members may be IGC subscribers, but if I understand
> our charter well, ALL list subscribers who are on the MAG should be
> considered CS members.
>
> I think I have reached my quota for the day.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list