[governance] PLEASE RESPOND - draft statement on reform of the

[Dina]

Dear Sergio,
.
But when I see somebody has got my opinion  I see no use to repeat the same things . OK I agree with those who think the term "reform" sends a message that could be
 misinterpreted and/or exploited by actors that strongly oppose the IGF
Kindest regards
 Dina
 
 

--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Presidencia Internauta <presidencia at internauta.org.ar> wrote:


From: Presidencia Internauta <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>
Subject: Re: [governance] PLEASE RESPOND - draft statement on reform of the
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca>
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 1:23 PM


 


Spanish & English
Spanish
Estimados todos: Con respecto a lo sugerido por Souter, creo que es importante la representación de sociedad civil y no la de individuos aislados. Es necesario que la representación sea de un colectivo de opinión y voluntad común y no la del sujeto aislado. Lo que se discute acá es siempre en función del hombre como ser colectivo, como expresión de intereses comunes y no de intereses individuales, nuestra fortaleza radica ahí y no en nuestras individualidades. Me sumo a lo expresado por Baudouin con respecto a seguir lo que se discute en la lista;  estoy al tanto de lo que se discute aunque poco he podido hacer en función de la brecha que impone el idioma, así y todo estoy todos los días intentando poner mi ingles lo mejor posible para poder intervenir más. 
Saludos cordiales
Sergio Salinas Porto
Internauta A rgentina
Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet
http://www.internauta.org.ar
 
English
Dear all: On Souter's suggestion, I think it is important according the representation of civil society and not isolated individuals. It is necessary that the representation is a collective opinion and common will and not the isolated individual, What we discuss here is always in terms of the man as a collective, as an expression of common interests rather than individual interests, our strength lies there and not in ours individualities.  I agree with what Baudouin expressed regarding what is discussed further in the list. I am aware of what is discussed in the list, but little I could do based on the gap imposed by the language; even so I am trying every day my English and I put my best to participate more. 
Best regards 

Sergio Salinas Porto
Internauta A rgentina
Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet
http://www.internauta.org.ar


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca>
To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [governance] PLEASE RESPOND - draft statement on reform of the

> Thanks, Jeremy. I agree with the suggestions for modification from 
> Souter and others and wait for the updated statement.
> 
> frt rgds
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:34:55 +0100, Bertrand de La Chapelle
>> <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Just one (I hope constructive) comment on the interesting draft you
>>> circulated. The title currently is : "Statement on the reform of the
>> IGF".
>>> I believe the use of the term "reform" sends a message that could be
>>> misinterpreted and/or exploited by actors that strongly oppose the IGF
>> 
>> Thanks for this point. The title was more of a working title for our use,
>> not specifically to be used when the document is submitted. Thus, the word
>> "reform" is not used in the body text. Thus we can, I agree, submit it
>> under a more neutral title such as "Submission of the IGC in taking stock
>> of the Sharm el Sheikh meeting of the IGF".
>> 
>>> A few minor suggested edits (*in blue* with suppressed words in red) are
>>> also included in the text. They usually are pointers to coded words in
>> the
>>> UN language or the governmental discussions and it's important for you to
>>> have them in mind.
>> 
>> Thanks, and thanks also to those who have commented on the preamble and
>> paragraph 1 so far. Please, anyone, feel free to move on to paragraphs 2, 3
>> and following. I will compile all the suggested changes (where compatible)
>> in a day or two and re-circulate.
>> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t 
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100114/41c25d86/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t