[governance] Secretary-General's recommendations on the

Fouad Bajwa fouadbajwa at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 04:55:03 EST 2010


Yes, I too support the notion for a statement!

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Yrjö Länsipuro
<yrjo_lansipuro at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I think there should be a statement.
> After the UNDESA representative declared at the IGF consultations that it
> was "not our intention to submit the report to the CSTD", there were
> immediate reactions from other stateholders, many (European) governments as
> well as from private sector representatives, asking for explanation why CSTD
> would be cut out of the process.
> The mandate and role of the CSTD in reviewing and assessing the
> implementation of WSIS outcomes is anchored in decisions by WSIS and ECOSOC,
> and well established in 2007-2009 when it annually drafted the  ECOSOC
> resolutions on the WSIS follow-up, including asessments on the perfortmance
> of the IGF. There is no reason for a sudden departure from this process on
> the question of the continuation of the IGF.
> As a former representative of Finland on CSTD (until my retirement last
> summer) I can confirm  that civil society and private sector representatives
> have much better access and opportunity to influence the proceedings at the
> CSTD than at the ECOSOC level. In fact, the ECOSOC decisions that opened
> CSTD up to other stakeholders speak about "participating in the work" of it,
> rather than just observing.
> Yrjö Länsipuro
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: jeremy at ciroap.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:15:58 -0500
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: [governance] Secretary-General's recommendations on the
> continuation of the IGF
>
> Those who were at the recent open consultation meeting, or have subsequently
> read the transcript, may recall the disagreement between UNDESA and the CSTD
> over where the UN Secretary-General's recommendations on the continuation of
> the IGF should be delivered, prior to the UN General Assembly receiving it
> to make a final decision.
> UNDESA, which administered the consultations for input to the
> Secretary-General, proposed to deliver the recommendations directly to
> ECOSOC.  The CSTD, which is actually an expert committee of ECOSOC, thought
> that it should receive those recommendations first, for consideration at its
> upcoming May meeting.
> The relevance of this to us is that the CSTD is open to a broader range of
> civil society and private sector observers than ECOSOC, including all those
> entities that were accredited at WSIS.  So for civil society, if we wish to
> give comment on the Secretary-General's recommendations, it is better that
> they go to the CSTD first.
> Does anyone think we should make a statement on this?
>
> --
>
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Project Coordinator
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> CI is 50
> Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in
> 2010.
> Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer
> rights around the world.
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/50
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless
> necessary.
>
>



-- 
Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
Internet Governance Advisor
ICT4D Social Practitioner & Researcher
Member Multistakeholder Advisory Group (IGF)
Member Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC)
My Blog: Internet's Governance: http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/
Follow my Tweets: http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
MAG Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVDW1tDZzA
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list