OFFLIST:Re: [governance] Separate statement on themes for Vilnius

[Carlos A. Afonso]

... which is also the problem of DA (development agenda) and several 
others. What we seek is to ensure the space to precisely provide more 
focus, deepen the debate and above all keep the underlying problems in 
the IGF main agenda.

IMHO

--c.a.

William Drake wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:51 AM, McTim wrote:
> 
>> Perhaps you could send me the link to the thread where it was defined?
>> I've 63 threads in my Inbox containing the term, and can't find a
>> definition of it in any of them.
> 
> McTim, Parminder, you are both right.  R&P is a broad and underspecified concept, which makes it a bit of a hard sell, AND the caucus has endorsed it several times and it enjoys a lot of support here.  The latter trumps the former, so it should be included in the statement.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t