[governance] Re: My note on CSTD IGF WG consultation Dec 17

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<AANLkTi=HZy_YTGgu5iUr8-CXVZ1YROxUCnU6q1ALaW5b at mail.gmail.com>, at 
16:06:06 on Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> 
writes
>I agree with Avri´s picture of "an open dialogue on internet 
>governance" and I also think it would not be strategically interesting 
>to have such a prominent focus on IGF, when our worries are actually 
>wider.

Focussing on just the IGF doesn't seem right.

>I also agree with Izumi´s evaluation that a loose and informal 
>coordination would be better, at least for now.

All the stakeholders need to meet and discuss this. To some extent that 
was maybe what the IGF was supposed to foster, but something a bit more 
agile would get faster results.

>Ayesha made very important suggestions (high quality real time 
>transcription and webcast) that I believe should be reinforced in all 
>our communications with CSTD. This is crucial if we want to involve a 
>larger group of people on this discussion.

CSTD experimented with transcription at their 24th November session, but 
it was difficult because of microphone problems, and also because the 
"who is talking now" protocol broke down. Although to their credit they 
have tidied almost all of the banter from the published transcripts:

http://www.unctad.info/upload/CSTD-IGF/Transcript_Morning.pdf
http://www.unctad.info/upload/CSTD-IGF/Transcript_Afternoon.pdf

-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t