[governance] Re: My note on CSTD IGF WG consultation Dec 17

[Marilia Maciel]

I agree with Avri´s picture of "an open dialogue on internet governance" and
I also think it would not be strategically interesting to have such a
prominent focus on IGF, when our worries are actually wider.

I also agree with Izumi´s evaluation that a loose and informal coordination
would be better, at least for now.

Ayesha made very important suggestions (high quality real time transcription
and webcast) that I believe should be reinforced in all our communications
with CSTD. This is crucial if we want to involve a larger group of people on
this discussion.

Marília



On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Roland Perry <
roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:

> In message <51F18FFA-253C-48E0-8FFA-F985049D20FD at acm.org>, at 10:35:20 on
> Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> writes
>
>  Then if we select 5, whether we will join ICC for private sector
>>> WG members and ISOC for Tech/Academic community and
>>> present 15 (if not IGOs), will be an important strategic decision
>>> worth to discuss on this list. This is, what I call "function" first.
>>>
>>
>> Is it: Intergovernmental Governmental Organizations  or International
>> Organizations.
>>
>> I have heard both used.
>>
>
> And even if it says IO, is that really a traditional home for the private
> sector or technical community organisations such as ICANN, and IETF.
>
>
>  The reason i am curious is that IGO pretty much already have an open pass
>> to anything the UN does, as I understand it, so I am not sure why
>> thee would be a specific IGO group.  Also even if there were, I do not
>> understand why it would be in the non-governemental half of the group.
>>
>
> http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ecn162010inf1_enfrsp.pdf
>
> ...is a recent attendee list from CSTD, and they have a category for
> Intergovernmental Organisation, separate from "United Nations"
> (organisations). And finally a category of "Specialised Agency".
>
> All of those are separate from actual government reps (categorised by UN
> region for the purposes of this WG), so would at least have to find some
> home as a distinct "5" I'd have thought.
>
> Bringing up the rear are NGOs, CS and business, and "Resource persons".
> --
> Roland Perry
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>



-- 
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101222/834ab997/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t