[governance] Amazing

[Izumi AIZU]

No, EU, Canada, US, Chile, UK, and Mexico are all voicing No.
Clearly.

izumi

2010/12/18 Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>:
> Izumi,
> Are EU, US and Canada accepting this approach ?
> B.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, we are or they are in the middle of battle - be invited guest is
>> almost done deal. Under the discretion of the Chair or not is the
>> remaining question, it seems. But they never give up to keep the
>> sovereignty.
>>
>> izumi
>>
>> 2010/12/18 Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>:
>> > if the wording says "invites to participate" that could be OK (see my
>> > proposed formulation) IF there is a set number of CS, PS and TA
>> > participants, identified in the group.
>> > otherwise, if it is in the direction of the Brazilian "invited to speak
>> > at
>> > the discretion of the Chair", it should be a no go.
>> >
>> > B.
>> >
>> >
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t