[governance] Round III - 15 from non-gov stakeholders 5+5+5

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I agree with Siva in principle

I recommend an attitude that WGIG is the lowest possible bar.

At this point I agree we should settle for WGIG levels.  but remember with IGO's having a free UN pass to all meeting alwasy and everywhere, the WGIG bar is far lower than it looks.

a.

On 17 Dec 2010, at 10:06, Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:

> Hi Siva,
> 
> Really trying to rock the boat, right :-))
> 
> WGIG balance is the upper bar, I'm afraid. would already be an achievement for this CSTD Chair group, given where we started. 
> 
> Best
> 
> B.
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Izumi, 
> 
> Chair seems to go in the right direction : Group OF the Chair, 15 non-governmental.
> 
> Still not precise regarding governmental participation. Cannot (and probably should not) be limited to host countries. In any case, Kenya should be included as upcoming host. 
> 
> I guess that 10 govts (2 per geographic regions) plus the (6) hosts could be an ideal situation. Would make 16 govts, 15 non-govts and, I suppose, 3 to 5 intergovernmental organizations.
> 
> It would still be 1 Government : 1 AllOtherStakeholders.  Shouldn't it be 1Government:1CivilSociety:1Business:1InternationalOrganization?  May not be agreeable under the circumstances, but just a thought.
> 
> Sivasubramanian M
>  
> 
> Let's see how it pans out. Still some fight ahead.
> 
> Best
> 
> Bertrand
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Izumi AIZU <aizu at anr.org> wrote:
> 3 times 5 = 15, plus 5 host countries = 20.
> 
> izumi
> 
> 
> 2010/12/17 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How many government members in the WG?
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> > On 17 Dec 2010, at 09:20, Izumi AIZU wrote:
> >
> >> After Lunch
> >>
> >> Chair
> >> Thank you for the fruitful, open and frank discussion this morning.
> >> As chair I listened carefully.
> >> Commonly agreed that all stakeholder should be inclusive for the WG.
> >> Proposal for consideration
> >>
> >> We have 15 from Stakeholders plus International Organizations.
> >> From 15, 5 from Academic and Technical community
> >> 5 from Civil Society and 5 from the business group.
> >> The leadership of these organizations will be able to select
> >> representatives to join the member states of WG.
> >>
> >> WG is going to be the advisory group to the chair,
> >> WG has the limited duration.
> >> WG work be approved or amended by CSTD.
> >> Now I invite members for the contribution and look for consensus.
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> >> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> >> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >>
> >> For all list information and functions, see:
> >>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >>
> >> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >>
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
>                         >> Izumi Aizu <<
> 
>           Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
> 
>            Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
>                                   Japan
>                                  * * * * *
>            << Writing the Future of the History >>
>                                 www.anr.org
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
> 
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry
> ("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
> 
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry
> ("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t