[governance] Round III - 15 from non-gov stakeholders 5+5+5

[Izumi AIZU]

South Africa
To reiterate our position:

We are confused.
On Dec 6, WG is established. The only remaining task is how to engage
other stakeholders.
In the morning we had agreement. But now we have no agreement.
Back to zero – we agree with India.
We encourage Chair to rethink your proposal.

Chair
Now Madam Chair will rethink the proposal to go forward.
<laugh>
The resolution the Chair of WG to establish in an open and inclusive
manner a working group which would compile and seek for inputs for all
member states and other stakeholders - inline with Tunis Agenda.
Are we on consensus on this?

Philippines
This is WG of commission, but not of Chair.
If this is WG of Chair, the Chair can do anything

Chair
Therefore, the WG is of CSTD?
That work is concluded?

EU
Mandate given – by ECOSOC – for the Chair to setup such group.
We don’t have to decide – whether in the framework of CSTD or not…
The only thing which counts is para 30 of ECOSOC resolution

US
We are in interesting phase of conversation. I would disagree – who
said we are drifted from morning.
Making formula of practical working group.
It is the CSTD working Group.
I don’t think we will go back.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t