[governance] WG - +5?

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<AANLkTinZK0meDNu6V0QX9x0he7o=MznqHnNGhnLGvPrB at mail.gmail.com>, at 
22:55:40 on Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Izumi AIZU <aizu at anr.org> writes

The reason I mentioned the 3+3+3, now maybe 2+2+1, is because it's 
probably quite difficult to argue that two Civil Society people, extra 
at the table, will be a threat to the smooth working; you could even say 
that the extra legitimacy it provides the process would be invaluable to 
the CSTD.

Meanwhile, as I said on Monday, it might be useful to have names (who 
have travel budgets) up your sleeve, to show that such a late relaxation 
of the rules would actually work.

>Well, yes, the direction is not bad, but UNLESS we work hard,
>this will not be achieved. We need more voices expressed
>inside and outside the CSTD meeting tomorrow, clearly heard.
 >
>izumi
>
>2010/12/16 Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org>:
>> These formulas sound like football formations. Would be good if we have
>> Mourinho, or Guardiolo as our strategy advisor.
>>
>> I also think this is a move in the right direction.
>>
>> Anriette
>>
>>> Going in the right direction then; not quite the 3+3+3 that I proposed
>>> on Monday, but maybe 2+2+1?
>>> --
>>> Roland Perry

-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t