[governance] EC consultation in NY: my report

[McTim]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
> Taking off my coordinator hat, I think there is another option:
>
> Still trying to make EC consultation process also as multi-stakeholder,
> in view of, if any, EC WG or something created, it should be
> MSH we should stick to.

agreed.

>
> That does not mean to consider empowering IGF including the
> possible option of making recommendations or reports, etc.
> something similar to, perhaps, WGIG kind of exercise.

agreed.  I like Avri's points:

1. "if the governments go off and do their own thing, why would any of
the Internet governance organizations ever comply with their
decisions."

2. "how does one achieve enhanced cooperation locked in room by ones self."

I think we ought to smack them upside their collective heads with
these stark, plain spoken realities.

They won't like it, but they need to hear it!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t