[governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG composition only by governments

[Marilia Maciel]

I agree that we sign it as well.

That does not hamper us from sending a statement on behalf of IGC with any
additional point we believe it would be important to make.

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree, and I support signing it too because the time constraint and the
> need to act quickly
> Rafik
>
>
>
> 2010/12/9 Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu>
>
> Ixumi,
>>
>> Well done, I support IGC signing on immediately.
>>
>> Since this is not a letter from IGC alone but from a coalition and since
>> the letter reads well for cs (at least to me), one expedient manouver is for
>> our co-coordinators to sign on like - right now - while you wait say 12hrs
>> for any objections to surface on the list.
>>
>> If none do, then just remove your names, leave 'IGC' and we're done.
>>
>> My 2 centavos on how to play this.
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> PS: There's a chance I can join David, Milton and maybe Avri in NYC on
>> 14th as I have another event to attend that evening there. If I do I can
>> help make some - semi-polite - noise over this if still necessary, then.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: izumiaizu at gmail.com [izumiaizu at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Izumi AIZU [
>> iza at anr.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:53 PM
>> To: Governance List
>> Subject: [governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG
>> composition only by governments
>>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> The "rumor" that the decision to compose CSTD WG only by governments
>> is now proven to be true, decided by very few members of CSTD.
>>
>> I have contacted ICC and ISOC, similar to the joint letter work we had on
>> Dec 14 consultation on enhanced cooperation. They shared the same
>> concern and worked out with many others mostly at ICANN Cartagena
>> meeting including ICANN, government folks etc:  UK, Sweden, US,
>> ICANN, ccNSO etc.
>>
>> Here is the draft text as of now. They plan to send it shortly, and asking
>> IGC
>> to join. There may be last-minute minor edit, but it is almost final.
>>
>> I propose that IGC to sign. IF you have any comments or suggestions,
>> please reply to this quickly.  In general, we need 48 hours to decide,
>> but in this
>> special case, we may not have that luxury of time.
>>
>> I have prepared our own draft (sorry for the complication), and now
>> it is being edited by our nominees for CSTD WG. My suggestion is
>> to carry on this draft as well, and send it in addition to the joint one.
>>
>> I will post that draft in a separate email and welcome your comments.
>> We will send that and perhaps make statement at Dec 17 WG meeting
>> if they do not change their decision. We will also include that and
>> read that at Dec 14 EC consultation meeting in New York.
>>
>> Sorry for the confusing manner, but this could happen, and I think
>> acting quickly to keep the Multi-stakeholder framework is urgently
>> needed and important for us.
>>
>> I hope you understand and support this.
>>
>> best,
>>
>> izumi
>>
>> ------------------
>> DRAFT
>>
>> To Frederic Riehl
>> Cc Ghana Chair of the CSTD
>>
>> We are surprised and deeply concerned by the CSTD Bureau’s decision
>> that  the Working Group on IGF Improvements mandated by resolution
>> (2010/2) of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
>> will be composed exclusively of member states.
>> This ECOSOC resolution, which was initially negotiated during the CSTD
>> in May 2010 by or in the presence of many of the signatories below,
>> asked the Chair of the CSTD to establish a Working Group to: "seek,
>> compile and review inputs from all Member States and all other
>> stakeholders on improvements to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),
>> in line with the mandate set out in the Tunis Agenda".
>> These words are a clear reference to the paragraph of the WSIS Plan of
>> Action (Geneva 2003) that led to the establishment of the very
>> successful Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) and ultimately
>> the creation of the IGF itself:
>>
>> We ask the Secretary-General of the United Nations to set up a working
>> group on Internet governance, in an open and inclusive process that
>> ensures a mechanism for the full and active participation of
>> governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing
>> and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
>> international organizations and forums, to investigate and make
>> proposals for action…
>>
>> We therefore expected that the composition of the Working Group would
>> be strongly inspired by the methodology adopted for setting up the
>> multi-stakeholder WGIG, as stated as the CSTD Vice-Chair’s
>> recommendation in his report on the meeting he convened on 16
>> September 2010.
>>
>> The format decided by the Bureau of the CSTD is contrary to both the
>> letter and the spirit of the ECOSOC resolution and is therefore not
>> acceptable.
>>
>> In any event, it is not up to the Bureau of the CSTD to make a
>> decision on this matter. This is not a Working Group of the CSTD, but
>> rather a Working Group to be convened by the Chair of the CSTD as
>> instructed by the ECOSOC resolution.
>> The CSTD Chair entrusted you with the mission of implementing the
>> request made to her. In light of that and the above information we
>> urge you to retract the decision of 7 December, and to establish an
>> appropriately constituted Working Group consistent with the WSIS
>> formulation ensuring “the full and active participation of
>> governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing
>> and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
>> international organizations and forums”.
>>
>> ------------------
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>



-- 
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101208/05f4990a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t