[governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG composition only by governments

[Rafik Dammak]

I agree, and I support signing it too because the time constraint and the
need to act quickly
Rafik



2010/12/9 Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu>

> Ixumi,
>
> Well done, I support IGC signing on immediately.
>
> Since this is not a letter from IGC alone but from a coalition and since
> the letter reads well for cs (at least to me), one expedient manouver is for
> our co-coordinators to sign on like - right now - while you wait say 12hrs
> for any objections to surface on the list.
>
> If none do, then just remove your names, leave 'IGC' and we're done.
>
> My 2 centavos on how to play this.
>
> Lee
>
> PS: There's a chance I can join David, Milton and maybe Avri in NYC on 14th
> as I have another event to attend that evening there. If I do I can help
> make some - semi-polite - noise over this if still necessary, then.
> ________________________________________
> From: izumiaizu at gmail.com [izumiaizu at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Izumi AIZU [
> iza at anr.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:53 PM
> To: Governance List
> Subject: [governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG
> composition only by governments
>
> Dear list,
>
> The "rumor" that the decision to compose CSTD WG only by governments
> is now proven to be true, decided by very few members of CSTD.
>
> I have contacted ICC and ISOC, similar to the joint letter work we had on
> Dec 14 consultation on enhanced cooperation. They shared the same
> concern and worked out with many others mostly at ICANN Cartagena
> meeting including ICANN, government folks etc:  UK, Sweden, US,
> ICANN, ccNSO etc.
>
> Here is the draft text as of now. They plan to send it shortly, and asking
> IGC
> to join. There may be last-minute minor edit, but it is almost final.
>
> I propose that IGC to sign. IF you have any comments or suggestions,
> please reply to this quickly.  In general, we need 48 hours to decide,
> but in this
> special case, we may not have that luxury of time.
>
> I have prepared our own draft (sorry for the complication), and now
> it is being edited by our nominees for CSTD WG. My suggestion is
> to carry on this draft as well, and send it in addition to the joint one.
>
> I will post that draft in a separate email and welcome your comments.
> We will send that and perhaps make statement at Dec 17 WG meeting
> if they do not change their decision. We will also include that and
> read that at Dec 14 EC consultation meeting in New York.
>
> Sorry for the confusing manner, but this could happen, and I think
> acting quickly to keep the Multi-stakeholder framework is urgently
> needed and important for us.
>
> I hope you understand and support this.
>
> best,
>
> izumi
>
> ------------------
> DRAFT
>
> To Frederic Riehl
> Cc Ghana Chair of the CSTD
>
> We are surprised and deeply concerned by the CSTD Bureau’s decision
> that  the Working Group on IGF Improvements mandated by resolution
> (2010/2) of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
> will be composed exclusively of member states.
> This ECOSOC resolution, which was initially negotiated during the CSTD
> in May 2010 by or in the presence of many of the signatories below,
> asked the Chair of the CSTD to establish a Working Group to: "seek,
> compile and review inputs from all Member States and all other
> stakeholders on improvements to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),
> in line with the mandate set out in the Tunis Agenda".
> These words are a clear reference to the paragraph of the WSIS Plan of
> Action (Geneva 2003) that led to the establishment of the very
> successful Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) and ultimately
> the creation of the IGF itself:
>
> We ask the Secretary-General of the United Nations to set up a working
> group on Internet governance, in an open and inclusive process that
> ensures a mechanism for the full and active participation of
> governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing
> and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
> international organizations and forums, to investigate and make
> proposals for action…
>
> We therefore expected that the composition of the Working Group would
> be strongly inspired by the methodology adopted for setting up the
> multi-stakeholder WGIG, as stated as the CSTD Vice-Chair’s
> recommendation in his report on the meeting he convened on 16
> September 2010.
>
> The format decided by the Bureau of the CSTD is contrary to both the
> letter and the spirit of the ECOSOC resolution and is therefore not
> acceptable.
>
> In any event, it is not up to the Bureau of the CSTD to make a
> decision on this matter. This is not a Working Group of the CSTD, but
> rather a Working Group to be convened by the Chair of the CSTD as
> instructed by the ECOSOC resolution.
> The CSTD Chair entrusted you with the mission of implementing the
> request made to her. In light of that and the above information we
> urge you to retract the decision of 7 December, and to establish an
> appropriately constituted Working Group consistent with the WSIS
> formulation ensuring “the full and active participation of
> governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing
> and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
> international organizations and forums”.
>
> ------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101209/d5151251/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t