[governance] enhanced consultations - further inputs

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<AANLkTi=m39COcAFW2fGBf=AE27QQYS8f1FC1zXj6ocL7 at mail.gmail.com>, at 
12:47:48 on Tue, 7 Dec 2010, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> writes
>On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:
>> Right:
>>
>> "If we can solve the problem of International Multistakeholder Governance
>> of the Internet (by the Internet) then we can apply it to governing
>> everything else in the world, and that could be quite some achievement."
>>
>> We're making some progress.
>
>I see asking for governmental intervention as regressive.

So you want multistakeholder, without but governments?

>> Advocating a Framework Convention as some of us have been suggesting 
>>as a next step for years...on the 14th would be a - small step - in 
>>the right direction.
>
>If we want to create a centralised, largely (or exclusively)
>intergovernmental  "ITU for the Internet" in charge of routing,
>content, security, cybercrime, FOI/FOE, IP, CIRs, and the regulation
>of all online businesses, then yes, it's a step in the right
>direction.
>
>If however, one prefers to keep Internet policy in the hands of the
>networks that make up the Internet, then no, it's a mis-step.

And does "one" prefer that? In any case, I was thinking more about 
public policy (political) issues than operational policy matters.

-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t