[governance] enhanced consultations - further inputs

[McTim]

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:
> Right:
>
> "If we can solve the problem of International Multistakeholder Governance
> of the Internet (by the Internet) then we can apply it to governing
> everything else in the world, and that could be quite some achievement."
>
> We're making some progress.

I see asking for governmental intervention as regressive.

>
> Advocating a Framework Convention as some of us have been suggesting as a next step for years...on the 14th would be a - small step - in the right direction.

If we want to create a centralised, largely (or exclusively)
intergovernmental  "ITU for the Internet" in charge of routing,
content, security, cybercrime, FOI/FOE, IP, CIRs, and the regulation
of all online businesses, then yes, it's a step in the right
direction.

If however, one prefers to keep Internet policy in the hands of the
networks that make up the Internet, then no, it's a mis-step.

>
> The language from the ITforchange EC submission could get ball rolling.

down a very slippery slope!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t