[governance] enhanced consultations - further inputs

[Lee W McKnight]

Right:

"If we can solve the problem of International Multistakeholder Governance
of the Internet (by the Internet) then we can apply it to governing
everything else in the world, and that could be quite some achievement."

We're making some progress.

Advocating a Framework Convention as some of us have been suggesting as a next step for years...on the 14th would be a - small step - in the right direction. 

The language from the ITforchange EC submission could get ball rolling. 

Lee
________________________________________
From: governance-request at lists.cpsr.org [governance-request at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Roland Perry [roland at internetpolicyagency.com]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 3:45 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] enhanced consultations - further inputs

In message
<93F4C2F3D19A03439EAC16D47C591DDE0330006EE5 at suex07-mbx-08.ad.syr.edu>,
at 16:58:51 on Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> writes
>First,
>
>Since I seem to be taking the unpopular positions of late - allow me to
>defend the ITU's honor : )
...
> Anyway, point is in spite of ITU's interminable processes, they work
>reasonably well for...190 countries; and lots of users.

I wasn't intending to knock the ITU, although it's a spectator sport for
many. I try to "walk a mile in their shoes" before criticising anyone,
and in this case have attended about 20 full days of ITU meetings and
conferences in person, and the same again by remote participation.

>Leaving aside for now how they may be improved in a multistakeholder
>manner.

There are improvements to transparency which could be made, but there
are also funding issues. But mindful that it's a membership
organisation, and everyone has a government close at hand which is a
member, we are all quite close to the process if we want to be.

>Now back to the question at hand, can we do better than that for global
>democratic processes around Internet governance? Of course.  See
>there's these Internet protocols which make it trivially easy to go
>from local to global...ok yeah more than that is needed but scalability
>is NOT the problem.

That's a bit like saying it would be easy for everyone to get into the
governance of air traffic control, because planes fly everywhere. But
that's an illusion.

>Being afraid to even broach the subject is the surest way to make sure
>it never happens.
>
>So definitely that should be a talking point for David A., however it
>is wordsmithed between now and 12.14, starting from Parminder's pretty
>reasonable draft.

If we can solve the problem of International Multistakeholder Governance
of the Internet (by the Internet) then we can apply it to governing
everything else in the world, and that could be quite some achievement.
--
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t