[governance] enhanced consultations - further inputs

Roland Perry roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Fri Dec 3 05:00:23 EST 2010


In message <C91ECD16.14103%ian.peter at ianpeter.com>, at 16:36:38 on Fri, 
3 Dec 2010, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> writes
>Number one on my list here would be issues of transboundary 
>jurisdiction. They are not handled well ? IGC has run workshops on this 
>at the last few IGFs.
>
>Further work needs to be done here.  I could list a few of the past 
>anomalies but I think  most people here are aware of them. It?s a mess, 
>and the country or a company resident in any country of the registrant, 
>the registry, the registrar or the hosting organisation could all get 
>involved in legal action against a site that offends the nation state 
>of any of these.
>
>The process to be pursued to sort this out starts with the adoption of 
>some universal principles IMHO.

Which is exactly what things like the CoE's Budapest Convention, or 
several of the OECD's initiatives are all about.

But they don't get much approval from folks around here, from what I can 
see.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list