[governance] Clinton Admits: "Free" Trade is Harmful to 3rd

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 10:59:25 EDT 2010


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
>
>
<snip>
>>
>> Does NIC.br actually sub-allocate it's own allocations or just
>> evaluate LIR applications and pass them on to LACNIC? Can LIRs in BR
>> go to LACNIC directly or is that not allowed under Brazilian law?
>
> Like Japan and Mexico, Brazil has a centralized service for IP
> distribution. It is not Brazilian law, it is a CGI.br policy. The
> Brazilian decree just delegates to CGI.br the task of managing IP
> numbers and the .br ccTLD. How IP numbers are distributed is not really
> relevant to our specific discussion here.


I think it is.

Can you answer the questions please? am quite curious!
<snip>
>>
>> And where does the money come from if not from leasing Internet
>> resources to (mostly) commercial entities?
>
> The "little" difference is that there are no business intermediaries in
> the transaction seeking to make the most money out of it.

Why then can I go to http://www.101domain.com/country_domain.htm and
get 2nd level .br names?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



More information about the Governance mailing list